> //Gmesh input File created by Gmeshgen. > exaclty in the same color as the backround, they are not displayed.
> idea? I mean it would be good to have a look at the mesh to know if Right now i'm using gmsh-1.65.0 on a SuSE 9.2. > well, i tried a bit, but didn't get any real change. The FreeFEM type to define a 2d mesh object is mesh. > lines are crossing (104 & 96, 103 & 96) or superposed. In this section, operators and tools on meshes are presented. > Moreover the end of your Line Loop 143 is really wrong, some of the > Why so? I checked now all the orders of thge line loops and didn't find > So still there isn't a solution - except, that there is no mesh being > Info : Saving all elements (discarding physical groups)
#Gmsh define mash along a fault windows#
The most obvious hazard is that of large earthquakes, which induce ground shaking over a large area that can cause heavy objects to fall and windows to shatter, and can cause structural damage to buildings and bridges. > '/home/bstoeve/SHERWIN/Meshing/2dpfouriersponge/fx79tu.msh' Major active faults such as the Hayward Fault are associated with many hazards. > '/home/bstoeve/SHERWIN/Meshing/2dpfouriersponge/fx79tu.geo' > Info : Build options : GSL TRIANGLE NETGEN TETGEN JPEG PNG ZLIB > The triangular meshing (2D), well still looks the same. > The isotropic meshing still doesn't work (it enters a loop of resizing The only solution is to decrease the characteristic length associated to the triangles, as I did in the attached file. The different mesh algorithms are not able to perform à smooth transition in the region between the triangles and the wing. The problem comes from the characteristic length associated to the points of the two triangles, which is much too large with respect to the small characteristic length of the points on the nearest object (wing ?). Mesh not displayed David Colignon David.Colignon at ulg.ac.be
0 kommentar(er)
